I'm interested in hearing your thoughts about Signal-to Noise Ratio. How many of you use it daily? What do you use to calculate it? Does it fulfill your need for a spectrum analyzer?
For a refresher on signal-to-noise (snr), I'm providing some links:
"Although not technically correct, many Wi-Fi vendors define signal quality as Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR). The signal-to-noise ratio is simply the difference in deccibles between the received signal and the background (noise floor, or most importantly the receiver's threshold)."
Signal-to-Noise Ratio defined by CWNPTo visually explain the Signal-to-Noise ratio, I will include this modified image of a Wi-Spy and Chanalyzer. It is a very simple calculation, subtract the noise level from the signal. As you can see in the image (and contrary to popular belief), the SNR does little to indicate interference from non-wi-fi devices co-existing in the same spectrum.When performing a RF site survey, it’s important to define the range boundary of an access point based on signal-to-noise (SNR) ratio, which is the signal level (in dBm) minus the noise level (in dBm).
Wi-Fi: Define Minimum SNR Values for Signal Coverage - Enterprise Networking
There have been numerous Signal-to-Noise feature requests for both inSSIDer and Chanalyzer. I believe there are a lot of professionals who actively use it daily. It can be a very useful calculation for environments with varying noise floors. Because many Wi-Fi vendors don't report SNR and the ones that do calculate it do so inaccurately I'm curious to know more about what our customers are doing with SNR.
- If you use a Wi-Fi card to detect SNR, does it have a fixed noise floor at -100dBm or does it actually detect the noise floor? If so, which card do you use?
- How has calculating SNR improved your WLAN installations?
- Do you use SNR as a quick and easy replacement for spectrum analysis and site survey?
Bookmarks